spot the LaTeX mistake
It took me forever to spot the (obvious) mistake in the following LaTeX formula
[sourcecode gutter=”false”]
\int \exp\[ -\{ (n+\sigma^{-2})\mu^2 -2n\mu{\bar x_n} + n ({\bar x_n})^2 \}/2 \]
[/sourcecode]
Can you find it?!
It took me forever to spot the (obvious) mistake in the following LaTeX formula
[sourcecode gutter=”false”]
\int \exp\[ -\{ (n+\sigma^{-2})\mu^2 -2n\mu{\bar x_n} + n ({\bar x_n})^2 \}/2 \]
[/sourcecode]
Can you find it?!
April 22, 2013 at 9:14 am
\[ means something different ..
How is your thumb?
April 22, 2013 at 8:50 am
\int and \exp !! I might avoid using [ ] in a complex mathematical expression not to get confused.. thanks!
April 22, 2013 at 8:36 am
it’s the {} instead of _{ } just after \mu ?
April 22, 2013 at 3:19 am
read of your accident soon after posting my reply..
get well soon!
April 22, 2013 at 3:08 am
\left[……………….\right]
?
April 22, 2013 at 1:53 am
I think your \[ and \] will give you problems. You should just use [ and ].
April 22, 2013 at 1:35 am
p.s. … how is the hand?
April 22, 2013 at 1:34 am
I’m pretty sure \[ won’t do what you want it to, in here. To say nothing of the \]
April 22, 2013 at 1:26 am
Isn’t “\[” (and “\]”) just “[” (and “]”) in LaTex?
April 22, 2013 at 1:08 am
I guess that the \[ is not in the beginning as it should be..