barbed WIREs


Maybe childishly, I am fairly unhappy with the way the submission of our Accelerating MCMC review was handled by WIREs Computational Statistics, i.e., Wiley, at the production stage. For some reason, or another, I sent the wrong bibTeX file with my LaTeX document [created using the style file imposed by WIREs]. Rather than pointing out the numerous missing entries, the production staff started working on the paper and sent us a proof with an endless list of queries related to these missing references. When I sent back the corrected LaTeX and bibTeX files, it answered back that it was too late to modify the files as it would “require re-work of [the] already processed paper which is also not a standard process for the journal”. Meaning in clearer terms that Wiley does not want to pay any additional time spent on this paper and that I have to provide from my own “free” time to make up for this mess…

One Response to “barbed WIREs”

  1. Fabrizio Leisen's avatar
    Fabrizio Leisen Says:

    I don’t think that is childish, I have sympathy for you . This is outrageously against common sense, I had a couple of interactions like this in the past (but not with Wiley).

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Xi'an's Og

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading