Archive for approximate Bayesian inference

next OWABI webinar [30 Jan]

Posted in pictures, Statistics, Uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , on January 19, 2025 by xi'an


The next One World Approximate Bayesian Inference (OWABI) Seminar is scheduled on Thursday, the 30th January at 11am UK time, with the speaker being Paul Bürkner (TU Dortmund University),

Amortized Mixture and Multilevel Models

Abstract: Probabilistic mixture and multilevel models are central building blocks in Bayesian data analysis. However, they remain challenging to estimate and evaluate, especially when the involved likelihoods or priors are analytically intractable. Recent developments in generative deep learning and simulation-based inference have shown promising results in scaling up Bayesian inference through amortization. Against this background, we have developed specialized neural inference frameworks for estimating Bayesian mixture and multilevel models. The involved neural architectures are closely mirroring the probabilistic symmetries and conditional (in-)dependencies assumed by these models. This not only speeds up neural network training, but also enables amortized inference for new datasets of varying number of groups and sample sizes.

Keywords: Amortized Bayesian Inference; Neural Posterior Estimation; Probabilistic Factorization

All about that [Bayes] seminar [24 Jan]

Posted in Books, pictures, Statistics, Travel, University life with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on January 13, 2025 by xi'an

The next All about that (Bayes) seminar will take place on Friday 24 Jan at SCAI, on the Jussieu campus, with the following talks. (Appearances to the contrary, I was not in the least involved in the program!)

13h30 – 14h30 Joshua Bon (OCEAN, Université Paris Dauphine) – Bayesian score calibration for approximate models

 Scientists continue to develop increasingly complex mechanistic models to reflect their knowledge more realistically. Statistical inference using these models can be challenging since the corresponding likelihood function is often intractable and model simulation may be computationally burdensome. Fortunately, in many of these situations, it is possible to adopt a surrogate model or approximate likelihood function. It may be convenient to conduct Bayesian inference directly with the surrogate, but this can result in bias and poor uncertainty quantification. In this paper (https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.05357) we propose a new method for adjusting approximate posterior samples to reduce bias and produce more accurate uncertainty quantification. We do this by optimizing a transform of the approximate posterior that maximizes a scoring rule. Our approach requires only a (fixed) small number of complex model simulations and is numerically stable. We demonstrate beneficial corrections to several approximate posteriors using our method on several examples of increasing complexity.

14h30 – 15h30 Giacomo Zanella (Bocconi University) – Entropy contraction of the Gibbs sampler under log-concavity

In this talk I will present recent work (https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.00858) on the non-asymptotic analysis of the Gibbs sampler, a classical and popular MCMC algorithm for sampling. In particular, under the assumption that the probability measure π of interest is strongly log-concave, we show that the random scan Gibbs sampler contracts in relative entropy, and provide a sharp characterization of the associated contraction rate. The result implies that, under appropriate conditions, the number of full evaluations of π required for the Gibbs sampler to converge is independent of the dimension. If time permits, I will also discuss connections and applications of the above results to the problem of zero-order parallel sampling, as well as extensions to Hit-and-Run and Metropolis-within-Gibbs.

Based on joint work with Filippo Ascolani and Hugo Lavenant.

16h00 – 17h00 Paul Bastide (Université Paris Cité) – Goodness of Fit for Bayesian Generative Models with Applications in Population Genetics

In population genetics, inference about intractable likelihood models is common, and simulation methods, including Approximate Bayesian Computation (ABC) and Simulation-Based Inference (SBI), are essential. ABC/SBI methods work by simulating instrumental data sets of the models under study and comparing them with the observed data set y⁰. Advanced machine learning tools are used for tasks such as model selection and parameter inference. The present work focuses on model criticism. This type of analysis, called goodness of fit (GoF), is important for model validation. It can also be used for model pruning when the number of candidates to be considered is excessive, especially in the context where data simulation is expensive. We introduce two new GoF tests based on the local outlier factor (LOF), an indicator that was initially defined for outlier and novelty detection. We test whether y⁰ is distributed from the prior predictive distribution (pre-inference GoF) and whether there is a parameter value such that y⁰ is distributed from the likelihood with that value (post-inference GoF).  We evaluate the performance of our two GoF tests on simulated datasets from three different model settings of varying complexity, and on a dataset of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers for the evaluation of complex evolutionary scenarios of modern human populations.

Joint work with Guillaume Le Mailloux, Jean-Michel Marin and Arnaud Estoup.

OWAB [season] I

Posted in Statistics, University life with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , on November 23, 2024 by xi'an

Our “new” seminar series, the One World Approximate Bayesian Inference (OWABI) Seminar, will see its second OWABI talk given on Thursday 28 November at 11am UK time. The speaker is Jeremias Knoblauch (University College London), who will talk about

Post-Bayesian machine learning

Abstract: In this talk, I provide my perspective on the machine learning community’s efforts to develop inference procedures with Bayesian characteristics that go beyond Bayes’ Rule as an epistemological principle. I will explain why these efforts are needed, as well as the forms which they take. Focusing on some of my own contributions to the field, I will trace out some of the community’s most important milestones, as well as the challenges that lie ahead. Throughout, I will provide success stories of the field, and emphasise the new opportunities that open themselves up to us once we dare to go beyond orthodox Bayesian procedures.

Keywords: Generalised Bayes; robustness; Bayesian machine learning.

OWAB [season] I

Posted in Statistics, University life with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on October 28, 2024 by xi'an

OWABC is dead, long life OWABI! After 5 seasons of the One World Approximate Bayesian Computation (ABC) Seminar, launched in April 2020 (!) to gather members and disseminate results and innovation during those weeks and months under lockdown, the organisers (incl. yours truly) have now decided to launch a “new” seminar series, the One World Approximate Bayesian Inference (OWABI) Seminar, to better reflect the broader interest and scope of this series, which goes beyond ABC. With Bluesky, X, and Linkedin accountsWith Bluesky, X, and Linkedin accounts. In particular, simulation-based inference and ML related techniques will play a crucial role. We are also pleased to announce that Stefan Radev has joined the OWABI Organiser Team.

The first OWABI talk will be given on Thursday the 31st October at 11am UK time. The speaker is Ullrich Koethe (University of Heidelberg), who will talk about

“Free-form flows for physics-informed generative modeling”

Abstract: The talk first introduces a useful categorization of the (sometimes confusing) “generative model zoo” in terms of different change-of-variables formulas. It then shows how normalizing flows, a major architecture for generative neural networks, can be used for simulation-based Bayesian inference in the sciences. Finally, it proposes free-form flows to simplify the incorporation of physical prior knowledge, e.g. rotation and translation invariance or the restriction of the distribution to a manifold, into generative models.
Keywords: normalizing flows; physical-informed neural networks; simulation-based inference

step-dads with Bayesian design [One World ABC’minar, 21 March]

Posted in Books, Statistics, University life with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , on March 18, 2024 by xi'an

The next One World ABC seminar is taking place (on-line, requiring pre-registration) on Thursday 21 March, 9:00am UK time, with Desi Ivanova (University of Oxford), speaking about Step-DAD: Semi-Amortized Policy-Based Bayesian Experimental Design:

We develop a semi-amortized, policy-based, approach to Bayesian experimental design (BED) called Step-wise Deep Adaptive Design (Step-DAD). Like existing, fully amortized, policy-based BED approaches, Step-DAD trains a design policy upfront before the experiment. However, rather than keeping this policy fixed, Step-DAD periodically updates it as data is gathered, refining it to the particular experimental instance. This allows it to improve both the adaptability and the robustness of the design strategy compared with existing approaches.

(Which reminded me of George’s book on design in 2008.)