Archive for Ohio State University

likelihood-free posterior density learning at OWABI [30 April, 1pm GMT+1, 2pm CEST, 8am EST]

Posted in pictures, Running, Statistics, Travel, University life with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on April 17, 2026 by xi'an

The next OWABI webinar will take place on 30 April, at 1pm Coventry time (2pm in Paris, 8am in Columbus, Ohio) and will feature

Oksana A. Chkrebtii (Ohio State University)

Likelihood-free Posterior Density Learning for Uncertainty Quantification in Inference Problems
Generative models and those with computationally intractable likelihoods are widely used to describe complex systems in the natural sciences, social sciences, and engineering. Fitting these models to data requires likelihood-free inference methods that explore the parameter space without explicit likelihood evaluations, relying instead on sequential simulation, which comes at the cost of computational efficiency and extensive tuning. We develop an alternative framework called kernel-adaptive synthetic posterior estimation (KASPE) that uses deep learning to directly reconstruct the mapping between the observed data and a finite-dimensional parametric representation of the posterior distribution, trained on a large number of simulated datasets. We provide theoretical justification for KASPE and a formal connection to the likelihood-based approach of expectation propagation. Simulation experiments demonstrate KASPE’s flexibility and performance relative to existing likelihood-free methods including approximate Bayesian computation in challenging inferential settings involving posteriors with heavy tails, multiple local modes, and over the parameters of a nonlinear dynamical system.

Familial inference

Posted in Statistics, University life with tags , , , , , , , , , on October 3, 2023 by xi'an

An ISBA-BNP webinar on Wednesday, 4 October, at 17:00 UTC by my friend Steve McEachern:

Familial inference: Tests for hypotheses on a family of centers

Many scientific disciplines face a replicability crisis. While these crises have many drivers, we focus on one. Statistical hypotheses are translations of scientific hypotheses into statements about one or more distributions. The most basic tests focus on the centers of the distributions. Such tests implicitly assume a specific center, e.g., the mean or the median. Yet, scientific hypotheses do not always specify a particular center. This ambiguity leaves a gap between scientific theory and statistical practice that can lead to rejection of a true null. The gap is compounded when we consider deficiencies in the formal statistical model. Rather than testing a single center, we propose testing a family of plausible centers, such as those induced by the Huber loss function (the Huber family). Each center in the family generates a point null hypothesis and the resulting family of hypotheses constitutes a familial null hypothesis. A Bayesian nonparametric procedure is devised to test the familial null. Implementation for the Huber family is facilitated by a novel pathwise optimization routine. Along the way, we visit the question of what it means to be the center of a distribution. The favorable properties of the new test are demonstrated theoretically and in case studies.
This is joint work with Ryan Thompson (University of New South Wales), Catherine Forbes (Monash University), and Mario Peruggia (The Ohio State University).