Archive for winery

Contextual Integrity for Differential Privacy #4 [23w5106]

Posted in Books, Mountains, pictures, Running, Statistics, Travel, University life, Wines with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on August 5, 2023 by xi'an

Mostly short talks. First talk by Thomas Seinke (Google) on interpreting ε, with a side wondering of mine on the relation between exp(ε) and the uncertainty that comes with Monte Carlo outcome. Which may relate to this 2022 paper by Ruobin Gong. Second talk by Gautam Kamath (U Waterloo) on large language models under privacy with “public” data. Questioning the appropriateness of ML benchmarks in terms of privacy. Third talk by Mark Bun (Boston U) on replicability, privacy and adaptive generalisation in machine learning, with a strange criticism of confidence intervals on the same parameter not intersecting for two independent studies. And proposing high probability replicable algorithms that can be put in duality with differentially private algorithms at the cost of lowering precision and effective sample size. We also had another group discussion on how to reach out about privacy guarantees, which made me realise there were GDPR compliance software available.

In the afternoon session, Shlomi Hod (Boston U) presented a practical case of designing a privacy preserving protocol for the Israeli birth record. With a strong opposition from stakeholders to use synthetic data, due to a semantic drift from synthetic to manipulated to fake, to lying. Wanrong Zhang did not talk about her stunning recent ICML paper but instead of another practical case connected with mobile based Covid case predictions, by adding minimal noise to mobility data. Nidhi Hegde (U Alberta) gave up talking on Thomson sampling with privacy protection, to focus on an ongoing health application for Alberta as more suited for the workshop. And Ria Safavi-Naini (U Calgary) drew a parallel between information theory and DP versus CI.

While the workshop was scheduled till Friday noon, in usual BIRS habits (!), the morning session was cancelled for most people leaving Kelowna in the morning.

Leave a comment »

Contextual Integrity for Differential Privacy #3 [23w5106]

Posted in Books, Mountains, pictures, Running, Statistics, Travel, University life, Wines with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on August 4, 2023 by xi'an

Morning of diverse short talks. First talk by Bei Jiang (Edmonton) on locally processed privacy for quantile estimation, which relates very much to our ongoing research with Stan, who is starting his ERC funded PhD on privacy. Randomised response, in having a positive probability of replacing indicators in the empirical cdf by a random or perturbed version whose bias can be corrected. I may have overdone the similarity though in confusing users with agents. Followed by a hacking foray by Joel Reardon (Calgary) into how much information is transmitted by apps on completely unrelated phone activity. (Moral: Never send a bug report.)

The afternoon break saw us visiting the Frind Estate winery on the other side of the lake. Meaning not only wine tasting (great Syrah!), and discovering an hybrid grape called Maréchal Foch, but also entering the lab with its mass spectrometer. (But no glimpse of the winemaking process per se…)

Leave a comment »

Contextual Integrity for Differential Privacy #2 [23w5106]

Posted in Books, Mountains, pictures, Running, Statistics, Travel, University life, Wines with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on August 3, 2023 by xi'an

Morning of diverse short talks. First one on What are the chances? Explaining ε towards endusers by presenting odds and illustrating the impact of including one potential user’s data. Then one on re-placing DP within CI in terms of causality. And multi-agent models, illustrated by the Cambridge Analytics scandal. I am still not getting the point of the CI perspective which sounds to me like an impossibility theorem. A bit as if Statistics had stopped at “All models are wrong” (as Keynes did, in a way). And a talk on Uses & misuses of DP inference, with nice drawings explaining that publicly available information (eg, smoking causes cancer) may create breaches of privacy (Alice may have cancer). Last talk of the morning on framing effects as privileging data processors and overly technical? Fundamental law of information privacy? Got me wondering about the lack (?) of dynamic perspective so far, in the (simplistic?) sense that DP does not seem to account for potential breaches were a secondary dataset to become available with shared subjects and record linkage. (A bit of a go at GDPR, for the second time within a week.)

Before, I had a rather nice early morning in woods on top of Okanagan Lake, crossing many white tailed deer, hopefully no ticks!, as well as No trespassing signs. And a quick and c…ool swim in the Lake 20⁰ waters. No sign of the large wildfires raging south in Osoyoos or north in Kalmoops. We had a fantastic lunch break at the nearby Arrowleaf Cellars winery, with a stellar pinot noir, although this rather made the following working session harder to engage with (not mentioning the lingering jetlag)!

Leave a comment »

AISTATS 2016 [#2]

Posted in Kids, pictures, Running, Statistics, Travel, University life, Wines with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on May 13, 2016 by xi'an

The second and third days of AISTATS 2016 passed like a blur, with not even the opportunity to write my impressions in real time! Maybe long tapa breaks are mostly to blame for this… In any case, we had two further exciting plenary talks about privacy-preserving data analysis by Kamalika Chaudhuri and crowdsourcing and machine learning by Adam Tauman Kalai. The talk by Kamalika was covering recent results by Kamalika and coauthors about optimal privacy preservation in classification and a generalisation to correlated data, with the neat notion of a Markov Quilt.  Other talks that same day also dwelt on this privacy issue, but I could not be . The talk by Adam was full of fun illustrations on humans training learning systems (with the unsolved difficulty of those humans deliberately mis-training the system, as exhibited recently by the short-lived Microsoft Tay experiment).

Both poster sessions were equally exciting, with the addition of MLSS student posters on the final day. Among many, I particularly enjoyed Iain Murray’s pseudo-marginal slice sampling, David Duvenaud’s fairly intriguing use of early stopping for non-parametric inference,  Garrett Bernstein’s work on aggregated Markov chains, Ye Wang’s scalable geometric density estimation [with a special bonus for his typo on the University of Turing, instead of Torino], Gemma Moran’s and Chengtao Li’s posters on determinantal processes, and Matej Balog’s Mondrian forests with a Laplace kernel [envisioning potential applications for ABC]. Again, just to mention a few…

The participants [incl. myself] also took one evening off to visit a sherry winery in Jerez, with a well-practiced spiel on the story of the company, with some building designed by Gutave Eiffel, and with a wine-tasting session. As I personally find this type of brandy too strong in alcohol, I am not a big fan of sherry but it was nonetheless an amusing trip! With no visible after-effects the next morning, since the audience was as large as usual for Adam’s talk [although I did not cross a machine-learning soul on my 6am run…]

In short, I enjoyed very much AISTATS 2016 and remain deeply impressed by the efficiency of the selection process and the amount of involvement of the actors of this selection, as mentioned earlier on the ‘Og. Kudos!

Leave a comment »