Archive for predatory publishing

attending a predatory conference

Posted in Books, Mountains, pictures, Travel, University life with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , on August 13, 2024 by xi'an


Nature of 18 July 2024 ran a story about predatory conferences, with an actual reporter on the ground! More precisely in the vicinity of Heathrow where they interviewed victims of this scam. Which reminded me of earlier instances, like when I had to explain the concept of a predatory conference to a Master student who was so excited to be invited to a conference. Or when I almost went to a Montparnasse hotel in Paris to check on the actual audience of a superposition of OMICS conferences on every imaginable topic, all happening together in the same room of that hotel. Which is exactly the situation reported in that article… A scary figure inside is that these predatory conferences are becoming “now more plentiful than legitimate ones”. Although this does not mean more people attend fake conferences than legit ones (Nature advances the figure of 10% researchers attending these pseudo-conferences.). The journal also address the elephant in the room, namely as to why people attend such conferences. Very junior researchers may get confused if this is their first invitation, but then why don’t they get a proper warning from their funding bodies or their senior colleagues?! And there is the acknowledgement that some researchers do attend fake conferences in full knowledge of the scam.

“They might be flattered to be invited or attracted by a glamorous location; questionable conferences often take place in tourist hotspots. Or they might attend simply to add a line to their CV.”

The examples chosen by Nature are obviously predatory in that they are run by an only-for-profit company, without a scientific board or society at the helm, and cramming talks about unrelated topics in a single hotel conference room (or online). One could think of extending the definition, though, to conferences without a clear scientific purpose, witness a yearly series I can think of (!) merging statistics and econometrics sub-conferences without an active scientific board, each session being the responsibility of its organiser. The one occasion I attended, both the sessions I talked in and I organised were only attended by the speakers…

another scam “conference”

Posted in University life with tags , , , on February 14, 2024 by xi'an

validated by rigorous peer review with the author’s benefit

Posted in Books, Statistics, University life with tags , , , , on April 28, 2023 by xi'an


The other day my co-authors and I received an email addressed to Dear Prof. Hugo Mariva (sic), offering to publish our importance Markov chain paper in the Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics which is very much likely a predatory journal, given the approximate English of the email, the journal acceptance window, its editorial board, and its publisher, which is associated with a myriad of journals in all fields and with amphed citation factors. (Plus the ultimate faux-pas of writing statistics with no upper case!) What I find fascinatingly scary or scarily fascinating is that we are in the final throes of submitting the paper to a respectable journal..!

We are glad to have established ourselves as a ruling Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics. Aside from conceptual and theoretical, the journal encourages the use of mathematics in various other scientific fields, such as Algebra, Analysis, approximation theory, Geometry, statistics, Mathematical Biology, Topology, Number Theory, etc.

We reviewed your research profile and enjoyed your article entitled ” The Importance Markov Chain ” and their research by providing rapid publications within 30-40 days, validated by rigorous peer review with the author’s benefit.

Nature & predatory publishers

Posted in Books, University life with tags , , , , , , on November 9, 2021 by xi'an

Nature of 26 October has another article (comment) that I found of general interest, namely a long report on one of the most prolific predatory publishers, OMICS, which got sued by the US Federal Trade Commission for “deceptive business practice”. The authors built a database of articles from fringe publishers. Exhibiting a rebranding of OMICS journals.

“The number of [OMICS] journals has grown faster than the number of publications, suggesting that many journals are shells with little content.”

They also found a massive number of re-published “papers from legitimate sources without crediting the original journal, and sometimes not the original author”. With all kinds of very shoddy attempts at hiding the plagiarism. The obvious problem is that such papers get evaluated by committees and reviewers without being ever read, with the name of the journal playing on the easy confusion with a legitimate journal. Except in the glaringly obvious cases. The recommendations from the authors include requesting for open peer reviews, linking funded publication costs to an adherence to some minimal transparency rules, moving to low-cost institutional platforms, and, more importantly, rewind the evaluation rules in academia so that low-quality, plagiarising, or otherwise illegitimate papers get identified as such, rather than betting on the reviewers spotting an already-known predatory journal or conference…

ABC in Kuala Lumpur [alas not!]

Posted in Statistics, Travel, University life with tags , , , , , , , on May 28, 2020 by xi'an

While attending an “ABC in…” conference in Malaysia would have been most exciting, barring the current difficulties with traveling, especially since I had not heard of it at an earlier stage and also had never visited Malaysia (except when considering that Singapore was was one of the 14 states of Malaysia from 1963 to 1965), the “International Conference on Approximate Bayesian Computation in Science and Engineering”, scheduled for Feb 2021 is alas not the right opportunity! As a fake conference run by WASET, the “World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology”, which runs thousands of conferences every year, usually cramming several of them in the very same room at the very same time in a periphery motel..! As attendees, if any, are not expected to… attend. Judging from the current list of “selected papers”, none of them has any connection with ABC. It would be funny, were it not a swindle of sorts…