Botond Szabó gave a BNP webinar last week on the recent paper he wrote with Bocconni colleagues Francesco Pozza and Daniele Durante, to appear in Series B. Which studies the impact of using skew-symmetric approximations of posterior distributions. Skew-symmetric distributions are easy to simulate, either by accept-reject or by exploiting the cdf x pdf structure and the symmetry in the pdf. The Bernstein-von Mises theorem can be expanded to this case, although I am not certain what this means! The main theoretical result is a gain in the magnitude of the approximation, eg in KL, which I did not expected. With questions about the choice of the cdf (which can be automatised when the original posterior is available or when a closed-form approximation replaces it) and of the symmetry point ξ for complex models (which seems to be the MAP by default.) and of the impact on marginal likelihood approximations (if it makes any sense).
Archive for skew-Normal distribution
Skew-symmetric approximations of posterior
Posted in Statistics with tags Bayesian nonparametrics, BNP Section, Milano, Series B, skew-Normal distribution, skew-symmetric distribution, Università Bocconi, webinar on February 26, 2026 by xi'an
Botond Szabó gave a BNP webinar last week on the recent paper he wrote with Bocconni colleagues
mostly Monte Carlo [last session of 2025]
Posted in Books, pictures, Statistics, Travel, University life with tags Bayesian classification, boulevard périphérique, ERC Synergy Grant, least squares, Ocean, Paris, PariSanté campus, Porte de Versailles, seminar, skew-Normal distribution, Université Paris Dauphine on December 10, 2025 by xi'an
3pm Least squares variational inference
Yvann Le Fay CREST, ENSAE
Variational inference seeks the best approximation of a target distribution within a chosen family, where “best” means minimizing Kullback-Leibler divergence. When the approximation family is exponential, the optimal approximation satisfies a fixed-point equation. We introduce LSVI (Least Squares Variational Inference), a gradient-free, Monte Carlo-based scheme for the fixed-point recursion, where each iteration boils down to performing ordinary least squares regression on tempered log-target evaluations under the variational approximation. We show that LSVI is equivalent to biased stochastic natural gradient descent and use this to derive convergence rates with respect to the numbers of samples and iterations. When the approximation family is Gaussian, LSVI involves inverting the Fisher information matrix, whose size grows quadratically with dimension d. We exploit the regression formulation to eliminate the need for this inversion, yielding O(d³) complexity in the full-covariance case and O(d) in the mean-field case. Finally, we numerically demonstrate LSVI’s performance on various tasks, including logistic regression, discrete variable selection, and Bayesian synthetic likelihood, showing competitive results with state-of-the-art methods, even when gradients are unavailable.
4pm Beyond the Unified Skew-Normal: Extended Models for Bayesian Classification
Paolo Onorati CEREMADE, Université Paris Dauphine – PSL
Binary classification models typically lose the conjugacy and computational simplicity enjoyed by Gaussian models. While the Unified Skew-Normal (SUN) family has recently been shown to be conjugated under the probit model, two new developments are presented that extend this idea to a broader class of link functions, including both logit and probit. In the parametric setting, the Perturbed Unified Skew-Normal (pSUN) distribution is introduced; it is conjugate to any binary regression model whose link admits a scale-mixture representation of Gaussian random variables, enabling tractable posterior summaries, efficient sampling schemes, and strong performance in high-dimensional covariate settings. The discussion then moves to the nonparametric domain, where the Quasi SUN family and the associated stochastic process provide conjugacy for nonparametric logit and probit models while preserving key closure properties. A stochastic representation of this process yields practical computational improvements over existing Gaussian-based approximations. Together, these SUN-type extensions offer promising tools for Bayesian classification with accurate posterior inference.
21w5107 [½day 4]
Posted in Statistics with tags 21w5107, BIRS-CMO, Casa Matemática Oaxaca, causality, Dirichlet trees, factor models, foundations of objective Bayesian methodology, Kingman's coalescent, la sierra oaxaqueña, multivariate probit model, objective Bayes, probit model, skew-Normal distribution, skewed distribution, unified skew-normal distributions on December 3, 2021 by xi'an
Final ½ day of the 21w5107 workshop for me, as our initial plans were to stop today due to the small number of participants on site. And I had booked plane tickets early, too early. I will thus sadly miss the four afternoon talks, mea culpa! However I did attend Noiritt Chandra’s talk on Bayesian factor analysis. Which has always been a bit of a mystery to me in the sense that the number q of factors need be specified, which is a prior input one rarely controls. Here the goal is to estimate a covariance matrix with a sparse representation. And q is estimated by empirical likelihood ahead of the estimation of the matrix. The focus was on minimaxity and MCMC implementation rather than objective Bayes per se! Then, Daniele Durante spoke about analytical posteriors for probit models using unified skew-Normal priors (following a 2019 Biometrika paper). Including marginal posteriors and marginal likelihood. And for various extensions like dynamic probit models. Opening other computational issues such as simulating high dimensional truncated Normal distributions. (Potential use of delayed acceptance there?) This second talk was also drifting away from objective Bayes! In the first half of his talk, Filippo Ascolani introduced us to trees of random probability measures, each mother node being the distribution of the atoms of the children nodes. (Interestingly, Kingman is both connected to (coalescent) trees and to completely random measures.) My naïve first impression was that the distributions would get more and more degenerate as the number of levels in the tree would increase, however I am unsure this is correct as Filippo mentioned getting observations on all nodes. The talk also made me wonder at how this could be related Radford Neal’s Dirichlet trees. (Which I discovered at my first ICMS workshop about 20 years ago.) Yang Ni concluded the morning with a talk on causality that provided (to me) a very smooth (re)introduction to Bayesian causal graphs.
Even more than last time, I enormously enjoyed the workshop, its location, the fantastic staff at the hotel, and the reconnection with dear friends!, just regretting we could not be a few more. I appreciate the efforts made by on-line participants to stay connected and intervene (thanks, Ed!), but the quality of interactions is sadly of another magnitude when spending all our time together. Hopefully there will be a next time and hopefully we’ll then be back to larger size (and hopefully the location will remain the same). Hasta luego, Oaxaca!
Rather hurriedly, here is the announcement for the last mostly MC seminar this year, to take place at 3-5pm this very Friday, Dec 12, 2025. It will take place in