Archive for Bayesian inference

Bayesian model averaging with exact inference of likelihood- free scoring rule posteriors [23/01/2024, PariSanté campus]

Posted in pictures, Statistics, Travel, University life with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , on January 16, 2024 by xi'an

A special “All about that Bayes” seminar in Paris (PariSanté campus, 23/01, 16:00-17:00) next week by my Warwick collegue and friend Rito:

Bayesian Model Averaging with exact inference of likelihood- free Scoring Rule Posteriors

Ritabrata Dutta, University of Warwick

A novel application of Bayesian Model Averaging to generative models parameterized with neural networks (GNN) characterized by intractable likelihoods is presented. We leverage a likelihood-free generalized Bayesian inference approach with Scoring Rules. To tackle the challenge of model selection in neural networks, we adopt a continuous shrinkage prior, specifically the horseshoe prior. We introduce an innovative blocked sampling scheme, offering compatibility with both the Boomerang Sampler (a type of piecewise deterministic Markov process sampler) for exact but slower inference and with Stochastic Gradient Langevin Dynamics (SGLD) for faster yet biased posterior inference. This approach serves as a versatile tool bridging the gap between intractable likelihoods and robust Bayesian model selection within the generative modelling framework.

Masterclass in Bayesian Asymptotics, Université Paris Dauphine, 18-22 March 2024

Posted in Books, pictures, Statistics, Travel, University life with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on December 8, 2023 by xi'an

On the week of 18-22 March 2024, Judith Rousseau (Paris Dauphine & Oxford) will teach a Masterclass on Bayesian asymptotics. The masterclass takes place in Paris (on the PariSanté Campus) and consists of morning lectures and afternoon labs. Attendance is free with compulsory registration before 11 March (since the building is not accessible without prior registration).

The plan of the course is as follows

Part I: Parametric models
In this part, well- and mis-specified models will be considered.
– Asymptotic posterior distribution: asymptotic normality of the posterior,  penalization induced by the prior and the Bernstein von – Mises theorem. Regular and nonregular models will be treated.
– marginal likelihood and consistency of Bayes factors/model selection approaches.
– Empirical Bayes methods: asymptotic posterior distribution for parametric empirical Bayes methods.

Part II: Nonparametric and semiparametric models
– Posterior consistency and posterior convergence rates: statistical loss functions using the theory initiated by L. Schwartz and developed by Ghosal and Van der Vaart, results on less standard or well behaved losses.
– semiparametric Bernstein von Mises theorems.
– nonparametric Bernstein von Mises theorems and Uncertainty quantification.
– Stepping away from pure Bayes approaches: generalized Bayes, one step posteriors and cut posteriors.

Mostly Monte Carlo Xminas

Posted in Kids, pictures, Statistics, University life with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , on December 7, 2023 by xi'an

The next and last of 2023 occurrence of our monthly series of Parisian seminars on the theory and practice of Monte Carlo in statistics and data science, in conjunction with our ERC OCEAN project , will be on Friday 15 December. The next seminars will be on 15 January, 12 February, and 98 March.

4pm/16h CEST: SVBMC: Fast post-processing Bayesian inference with noisy evaluations of the likelihood

Grégoire Clarté – University of Helsinki, University of Edinburgh

In many cases, the exact likelihood is unavailable, and can only be accessed through a noisy and expensive process – for example, in Plasma Physics. Furthermore, Bayesian inference often comes in at a second moment, for example after running an optimization algorithm to find a MAP estimate. To tackle both these issues, we introduce Sparse Variational Bayesian Monte Carlo (SVBMC), a method for fast “post-processes” Bayesian inference for models with black-box and noisy likelihoods. SVBMC reuses all existing target density evaluations – for example, from previous optimizations or partial Markov Chain Monte Carlo runs – to build a sparse Gaussian process (GP) surrogate model of the log posterior density. Uncertain regions of the surrogate are then refined via active learning as needed. Our work builds on the Variational Bayesian Monte Carlo (VBMC) framework for sample-efficient inference, with several novel contributions. First, we make VBMC scalable to a large number of pre-existing evaluations via sparse GP regression, deriving novel Bayesian quadrature formulae and acquisition functions for active learning with sparse GPs. Second, we introduce noise shaping, a general technique to induce the sparse GP approximation to focus on high posterior density regions. Third, we prove theoretical results in support of the SVBMC refinement procedure. We validate our method on a variety of challenging synthetic scenarios and real-world applications. We find that SVBMC consistently builds good posterior approximations by post-processing of existing model evaluations from different sources, often requiring only a small number of additional density evaluations.

5pm/17h CEST: Variance reduction using control variates and importance sampling for applications in computational statistical physics

Urbain Vaes – INRIA, CERMICS

The scaling of the mobility coefficient associated with two-dimensional Langevin dynamics in a periodic potential as the friction vanishes is not well understood. Theoretical results are lacking, and numerical calculation of the mobility in the underdamped regime is challenging. In the first part of this talk, I will present a new variance reduction approach based on control variates for efficiently estimating the mobility of Langevin-type dynamics, together with numerical experiments illustrating the performance of the approach.

In the second part of this talk, we study an importance sampling approach for calculating averages with respect to multimodal probability distributions. Traditional Markov chain Monte Carlo methods to this end, which are based on time averages along a realization of a Markov process ergodic with respect to the target probability distribution, are usually plagued by a large variance due to the metastability of the process. The estimator we study is based on an ergodic average along a realization of an overdamped Langevin process for a modified potential. We obtain an explicit expression for the optimal biasing potential in dimension 1 and propose a general numerical approach for approximating the optimal potential in the multi-dimensional setting.

Bayesian inference and conformal prediction

Posted in Books, Kids, Statistics, University life with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , on October 10, 2023 by xi'an

Mostly Monte Carlo Se[a]minar

Posted in Kids, pictures, Statistics, University life with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on October 6, 2023 by xi'an

A brand new monthly series of Parisian seminars on the theory and practice of Monte Carlo in statistics and data science, in conjunction with our ERC OCEAN project. To kick start the series the organisers, Joshua Bon and Andrea Bertazzi, first postdocs in the project, will present some of their work on Friday 13 October, 4PM – 6PM, Room 7, PariSanté Campus 2 Rue d’Oradour-sur-Glane, Paris 15. The following seminars are planned on Friday 17 November and Friday 15 December.

4pm/16h CEST: Piecewise deterministic sampling with splitting schemes

Andrea Bertazzi, CMAP – École Polytechnique

Piecewise deterministic Markov processes (PDMPs) received substantial interest in recent years as an alternative to classical Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms. While theoretical properties of PDMPs have been studied extensively, their practical implementation remains limited to specific applications in which bounds on the gradient of the negative log-target can be derived. In order to address this problem, we propose to approximate PDMPs using splitting schemes, that means simulating the deterministic dynamics and the random jumps in two different stages. We show that symmetric splittings of PDMPs are of second order. Then we focus on the Zig-Zag sampler (ZZS) and show how to remove the bias of the splitting scheme with a skew reversible Metropolis filter. Finally, we illustrate with numerical simulations the advantages of our proposed scheme over competitors.

5pm/17h CEST: Bayesian score calibration for approximate models

Joshua Bon, Ceremade – Université Paris Dauphine-PSL

Scientists continue to develop increasingly complex mechanistic models to reflect their knowledge more realistically. Statistical inference using these models can be challenging since the corresponding likelihood function is often intractable and model simulation may be computationally burdensome. Fortunately, in many of these situations, it is possible to adopt a surrogate model or approximate likelihood function. It may be convenient to base Bayesian inference directly on the surrogate, but this can result in bias and poor uncertainty quantification. In this paper we propose a new method for adjusting approximate posterior samples to reduce bias and produce more accurate uncertainty quantification. We do this by optimizing a transform of the approximate posterior that maximizes a scoring rule. Our approach requires only a (fixed) small number of complex model simulations and is numerically stable. We demonstrate good performance of the new method on several examples of increasing complexity.