Archive for Joe Abercrombie

Best Served Cold

Posted in Books with tags , , on April 10, 2010 by xi'an

“Science is a system of rational thought devised to investigate the world and establish the laws by which it operates.” Joe Abercrombie, Best Served Cold

I have just finished Joe Abercrombie’s Best Served Cold I brought back from Texas. It is even darker and more sinister than the First Law trilogy. But, despite some flaws in the (predictable) plot and in the depth of the characters, not to mention some un-mentionable sex scenes, I enjoyed this single volume well enough to recommend it to readers of the First Law trilogy. The setting is exactly the same as the world in the First Law trilogy, some secondary characters being propelled to the front stage, while other major characters become accessories to the story.

“That was rhe strange thing about games of chances. The chances were always against the player. You could beat the numbers for a day, but you could never beat them in the end.” Joe Abercrombie, Best Served Cold

Although this will sound paradoxical to any reader of the book, Best Served Cold somehow feels more “homely”  (than the First Law trilogy) in that the plot follows a single character, Monza, in her senseless quest for revenge. Once again, there is no “good guy” in the novel and every character enjoys some dark side. Monza builds up a motley group of mercenaries to carry out her revenge and most of them end up in dire circumstances. Once again, Abercrombie is able to forge a very unforgiving universe with characters that are far from flawless but attractive nonetheless. The whole story shows a world on the brink of a barbaric collapse where mercenaries keep switching sides, cities are looted and re-looted, heads are repeatedly assassinated, and harvests destroyed… This is definitely a mature book, to keep away from young adults attracted by heroic fantasy. but the unravelling of the story is (mostly) fast paced enough to make reading the book compelling and above all enjoyable. (Okay, the happy ending could have been avoided, but then no major character would have been left alive by the end of the book! And the supernatural natures of the characters Shenkt and Ishri leave a large part unexplained…)

Last Argument of Kings

Posted in Books with tags , , on February 13, 2010 by xi'an

“As if there were some new way to look at them that would alter the terrible mathematics.”

Having read and finished the third volume of Joe Abercrombie’s trilogy, Last Argument of Kings (which is what Louis XIV had his canons engraved with!), I must say this final volume redeems the series after the disastrous and uninspiring second volume, Before they are hanged. There is a lot of action, almost too much in terms of fights and battles and deaths, most characters do not end up nice and cosy as in your regular fantasy novel but instead are mostly worse than at the begining of the first volume, and those getting the upper hand do not deserve it (including the Royal Idiot Jezal!, but also the sentimental torturer Glotka). The most creative part is about the First of the Magi, Bayaz, who turns out to be anything but a benevolent Gandalf, ready to bend (real hard) any rule and to sacrifice any number of friends and strangers to keep control of everything, as he had for many centuries. That he reveals himself as the ultimate bad guy is a great ending for the book. I thus soften my previous evaluation and consider that it is, in the end, a nice enough series, plagued with inconsistencies, sudden changes in the pace of the story, and underdevelopped characters, but enjoyable nonetheless. (I do not understand the raving reviews found on some blogs though as if this was the best fantasy story of the year…)

Before they are hanged

Posted in Books with tags , , , on October 29, 2009 by xi'an

The second tome of Joe Abercrombie’s The First Law trilogy, Before they are hanged, does not leave live up to its expectations. I really enjoyed the first volume, The Blade Itself, overreacting a little bit at the novelty in tone and style by suggesting a ranking in the New Yorker fantasy list, but this second volume definitely falls very short from my expectations! I mentioned the potential connections with David Eddings in my earlier post, and they are much more apparent in the second volume: the characters are lacking depth but not stereotypes, the way the central society behaves is caricatural, the enemies have endless facilities and power… The (obligatory) quest has started but the crossing of the continent to the other sea is very boring and does not bring further perspectives on the six characters, some of which like Qai and Longfoot (!) do not even seem to have a proper role in the trip. They were interesting anti-heros in the first volume, they are no longer that interesting nor that anti-heros. The other main character, Glokta, has also lost some of his cruel appeal by playing the rescuer to all distressed maidens crossing his path. Overall, the witty exchanges found in the first volume have mostly disappeared from the second (or I do not find them so funny!) So I fear this is another example of a good start turned into a tepid follow-up (please let not this happen to The Name of Wind!). Given the mixed reviews on the third volume, I am not sure I will give it a try!

The Blade Itself

Posted in Books with tags , , on September 8, 2009 by xi'an

Joe Abercrombie‘s first novel of his First Law trilogy, The Blade Itself, has been highly praised on most fantasy blogs and by readers as one of the best fantasy novels of the past years. I thus tried it and came out quite enthusiastic, even though I still rank Rothfuss’ The Name of the Wind as my top recent novel! The setting of Abercrombie’s universe is not particularly novel, a bit like Jones’ The Book of Worlds, with bands of grumbling mercenaries as in Nicholls’ Orcs, Cook’s Black Company or Moon’s Paksenarrion, the characters are not immensely surprising, having some of Eddings’ Belgariad‘s range of racial groups associated with idiosyncrasies—even though it completely avoids the stereotypical style of David Eddings!—, the role of magic and magicians, again related to Eddings’ Belgarath!, is only reluctantly acknowledged by most characters,  one of the main characters is a “bad guy” as in Hobb’s Farseer series or Martin’s Song of Ice and  Fire unfinished saga, and this first volume can be seen as a prologue to the coming volumes, since it only brings the customary “team” together before they start the usual “quest”… So why do I still like The Blade Itself?! The style is the main reason: Abercrombie’s writing is very crisp, with a lot of dark irony and humour even in the most desperate situations, the proper balance of political maneuvering, and major characters with many flaws but nonetheless lovable. The book has a bit of a light Terry Pratchett flavour in it and this makes for a very enjoyable read. (My only reservation is about the character Luthar who is (so far) sounding too much like a complete idiot although he is supposed to change in the second volume.)

Ps-The New Yorker published a list of seven essential fantasy books, list that does not countain The Blade Itself but should have, as “new kid on the block” representative! (It should also have avoided Goodkind for his terrible stories, Brooks for being so unimaginative and bland, and Erikson for being close to incomprehensible!!! And I would have included instead Roger Taylor’s Chronicles of Hawklan as a soft and poetic entry to the genre…)